For those who have tended to take a shallow view of the Citizens United case, this is a good opportunity to gain a deeper understanding of the legal and philosophical underpinnings of both the majority decision and the dissent, specifically in relation to the concepts of free speech. Published in the Harvard Law Review, I would suggest that it is very even handed in its analysis. Be sure to download and read the linked pdf; the web page is merely introduction.
[button link=”http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/124/november10/Comment_7328.php” color=”black” newwindow=”yes”] Read the original.[/button]